9 Comments

Clearly a very touchy amateur who doesn't understand that titles are crucial. If I were her editor, btw, I might have suggested "Return to Sender" because it's more oblique. I prefer titles that suggest.

Expand full comment

At 12, mad for all things Hitchcock, I aspired to be published in that magazine, with a companion episode on the TV show. This idea would have hooked me. I can see it as a half-hour show introduced by the master. But with your title, not hers.

Expand full comment

Commenting on people's work is so fraught with potential potholes... When people ask me to read their stuff, I pussyfoot, and I know these people, they've read my stuff, so we've established a writerly relationship, so to speak, lol. But still... careful, careful, slow moves :) - This is a funny post, Richard!

Expand full comment

I’d read “666 Chestnut.” Not so much “The Street.”

Expand full comment

Your title sounds way juicier!

Expand full comment

I laughed at this one...actually I'm pretty sure I laugh at all your posts. Thank you Richard.

Expand full comment

A lot of humour and tension. It's hard to take feedback if you're not ready for it.

Expand full comment

So funny! I would absolutely read „The Street“ expecting a really cool modern spin of a story, Avantgarde even. And would have been disappointed by the plot soon after. Your title would have warned me :) lots of woulds in this comment. Sorry it’s 11pm #tiredmom

Expand full comment
author

Oh yeah Laura The Street would work too in a different way

Expand full comment